<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>3monkeys &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys</link>
	<description>They say if you have a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 keyboards, eventually they will produce the works of Shakespeare. This is what happens when you put 3Monkeys at one keyboard...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Caught Trying to Change Wikipedia Entries</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/24/microsoft-caught-trying-to-change-wikipedia-entries/</link>
		<comments>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/24/microsoft-caught-trying-to-change-wikipedia-entries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3Monkeys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/24/microsoft-caught-trying-to-change-wikipedia-entries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine my surprise when a story I happened to cover yesterday splashed up on my Google Homepage. Google News reports over 200 references to the story. In Microsoft, Office Open XML and A Lie, I reported on Mr. Jelliffe&#8217;s offer and blog entry. I&#8217;m pleased to see that the story is getting national top tier [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/24/microsoft-caught-trying-to-change-wikipedia-entries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Office Open XML and A Lie</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/23/microsoft-office-open-xml-and-a-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/23/microsoft-office-open-xml-and-a-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3Monkeys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/23/microsoft-office-open-xml-and-a-lie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few day ago I posted an article, The Open XML Lie, I was misguided in that my arguments along with those or Rod Weir and Bob Sutor&#8217;s were so self evident that at minimum they would be understood. I was wrong, and I blame myself for not providing a clearer definition of the problem. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/23/microsoft-office-open-xml-and-a-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Open XML Lie</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/17/the-open-xml-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/17/the-open-xml-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3Monkeys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/17/the-open-xml-lie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob Weir recently posted &#8220;How to hire Guillaume Portes&#8220;, which appeared on Slashdot, both of which both are great resources for additional comments and debate. The basic premise of Rob&#8217;s article was that the Microsoft Open XML Specification was similar to creating a job description that would allow for only one qualified respondent. Such a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/17/the-open-xml-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longest Legitimate Reply on Digg? &#8220;Bad, Vista!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/07/longest-legitimate-reply-on-digg-bad-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/07/longest-legitimate-reply-on-digg-bad-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3Monkeys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/07/longest-legitimate-reply-on-digg-bad-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago I submitted a story on digg, Linux: Introducing The Data Corruption Bug, from Kernal Trap. I took a few people by surprise that I would post an article critical of Linux, but as an self-respecting journalist would (like there are many self-respecting journalist), I bypassed my personal bias and submitted the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2007/01/07/longest-legitimate-reply-on-digg-bad-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Differences in OpenOffice .odt vs Microsoft Word .doc</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/07/06/differences-in-openoffice-odt-vs-microsoft-word-doc/</link>
		<comments>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/07/06/differences-in-openoffice-odt-vs-microsoft-word-doc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3Monkeys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/07/06/differences-in-openoffice-odt-vs-microsoft-word-doc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is being archived here from its original publication in the 3Monkeyweb wiki. This is the first in a series of articles detailing my experiences with directly manipulating .odt. I currently have a project to clean up and unify a 800 plus page document that has been converted among several formats over the years. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/07/06/differences-in-openoffice-odt-vs-microsoft-word-doc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
