<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice ODF/.odt compared to Microsoft Word .doc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/</link>
	<description>They say if you have a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 keyboards, eventually they will produce the works of Shakespeare. This is what happens when you put 3Monkeys at one keyboard...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:30:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allegra Waycaster</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Allegra Waycaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>Unique piece of writing. Were would you obtained just about all the information from</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unique piece of writing. Were would you obtained just about all the information from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector Trevathan</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector Trevathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent site. Regards, From Staff member @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hidemylogin.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free Proxy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent site. Regards, From Staff member @ <a href="http://www.hidemylogin.info" rel="nofollow">Free Proxy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Schemes</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Schemes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>Do not agree I only use de-oudourant under one arm, so I know what I would have smelled of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not agree I only use de-oudourant under one arm, so I know what I would have smelled of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda M. Release</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda M. Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>Well done with this article its great We live in a society where pizza gets to your house before the police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done with this article its great We live in a society where pizza gets to your house before the police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjorie Schemes</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjorie Schemes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>I have never seen sucha s post that could change my point of view. I&#039;ve got the ship, you&#039;ve got the harbour ... what say we tie up for the night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never seen sucha s post that could change my point of view. I&#8217;ve got the ship, you&#8217;ve got the harbour &#8230; what say we tie up for the night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Great article, thanks for the share.  Blog bookmarked :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, thanks for the share.  Blog bookmarked <img src='http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: way to make money</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>way to make money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>I am impressed with all this useful information. Was WAY more than I expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am impressed with all this useful information. Was WAY more than I expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information!

I too would not necessarily say that OpenOffice wins round one. Compressing the documents is obviously not a priority for Microsoft and I think for good reason. I use OpenOffice almost exclusively but I have notice significantly longer load times. I did not understand why until I read your article.  If anyone is emailing either doc or odt they&#039;re idiots. Fortunately, OO makes it very easy to generate a pdf! Now, is there a way to tell OO not to compress the odt? I would guess not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information!</p>
<p>I too would not necessarily say that OpenOffice wins round one. Compressing the documents is obviously not a priority for Microsoft and I think for good reason. I use OpenOffice almost exclusively but I have notice significantly longer load times. I did not understand why until I read your article.  If anyone is emailing either doc or odt they&#8217;re idiots. Fortunately, OO makes it very easy to generate a pdf! Now, is there a way to tell OO not to compress the odt? I would guess not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>LOL! That comment about irregardless reminds me of when my wife used to say &quot;could you refrain from not doing that?&quot; So I comply. I keep right on doing it. It used to really get her mad just because I listened to her!  She hasn&#039;t done that in a long time so I guess she got the hint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! That comment about irregardless reminds me of when my wife used to say &#8220;could you refrain from not doing that?&#8221; So I comply. I keep right on doing it. It used to really get her mad just because I listened to her!  She hasn&#8217;t done that in a long time so I guess she got the hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeG</title>
		<link>http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/comment-page-1/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3monkeyweb.com/3monkeys/2006/12/29/openoffice-odfodt-compared-to-microsoft-word-doc/#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the consensus among references is that it is a blend of irrespective and regardless, both of which are commonly accepted standard English words. By blending these words, an illogical word is created. &quot;Since the prefix ir- means &#039;not&#039; (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means &#039;without,&#039; irregardless is a double negative.&quot;[1]  

thats from wiki.
Basically irregardless is a bastardization of the english language 
derived from a lazy crunch of two words when one isnt sure which to use.
and according to my father lol, its like nails on a chalkboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the consensus among references is that it is a blend of irrespective and regardless, both of which are commonly accepted standard English words. By blending these words, an illogical word is created. &#8220;Since the prefix ir- means &#8216;not&#8217; (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means &#8216;without,&#8217; irregardless is a double negative.&#8221;[1]  </p>
<p>thats from wiki.<br />
Basically irregardless is a bastardization of the english language<br />
derived from a lazy crunch of two words when one isnt sure which to use.<br />
and according to my father lol, its like nails on a chalkboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
